Skip to content
MCS · Rigs · Compare

Side-by-side, with the numbers that matter.

Two rigs, one table. Higher numbers win in cobalt; TDP and price flip.

0 of 32 fields comparable

⇄ swap sides
SpecAMD Instinct MI300XNVIDIA Eos DGX SuperPOD
AI Exaflops FP818.4
Bf16 Matrix Tflops Dense1,307.4
Compute Units304
DGX Node Count576
DGX PER POD32
Form factorOAM
Fp16 Matrix Tflops Dense1,307.4
Fp32 Vector Tflops163.4
Fp64 Matrix Tflops163.4
Fp64 Vector Tflops81.7
FP8 Matrix Tflops Dense2,614.9
FP8 Matrix Tflops Sparse5,229.8
GPU Count4,608
GPU TypeNVIDIA H100 (Hopper)
Gpus PER Node8
HBM (GB)192
HBM TypeHBM3
HPC Petaflops Fp64275
INT8 TOPS (dense)2,614.9
InterconnectNVIDIA Quantum-2 InfiniBand
LocationNVIDIA (in-house)
Matrix Cores1,216
Memory bandwidth (TB/s)5.3
Nvlink Switches360
Pcie GEN5
Pods18
Process Node NM5
Quantum2 IB Switches500
TBP Watts750
Tf32 Matrix Tflops Dense653.7
Tf32 Matrix Tflops Sparse1,307.4
Top500 Rank Jun20249
Compare · AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Eos DGX SuperPOD · MadCoolStuff